Rep: Let Voters Decide Gay Marriage [VIDEO]

Anti-same-sex marriage bill will come up for a vote next week.

The prime sponsor of a bill to is amending his legislation to include a statewide ballot initiative allowing people to vote on the measure in November.

State Rep. David Bates, R-Windham, said at a press conference today in Concord that it became evident that his bill did not have enough votes to override veto threat. In recent weeks, he began working on ways to amend his bill in order to gain enough votes to override the veto.  

The changes to House Bill 437 include what Bates called a more concise statement of purpose, including the reestablishment of civil unions without any civil rights challenges. It also eliminates the religious liberty clause and pares down the definition of marriage to about two brief paragraphs, he said.

“This will eliminate the baseless but effective, hysterical claims that others have been making that this bill would permit or encourage incest in New Hampshire,” he said. “Our opponents can no longer make the ridiculous claims that this law will eradicate the state’s anti-discrimination laws.”

Bates said the statewide ballot initiative had been added to the bill in an effort to allow the voters to determine the course of what the definition of marriage is. The question will read: “Shall New Hampshire law allow civil unions for same-sex couples and define marriage as a union between one man and one woman?”

It will not be binding on the Legislature, but he said the ballot measure will clarify the will of the people.

“There will be no more guessing, no more arguing or debating over dueling polls, just the actual voice of the people telling us what their will is on this issue,” he said. “I’m ready to accept and implement the will of the people on marriage in this state. I hope the rest of the Legislature is as well.”

Bates noted that the original same-sex marriage bill did not receive approval from the Judiciary Committee in 2009 and the state Senate determined it to be inexpedient to legislate. However, the Democrats were able to push through the bill by razor-thin margins, he said. The burden of changing law is a much higher threshold, he said, adding that the changes should allow more people to support the ballot initiative amendment.

Tyler Deaton, a lobbyist for , said many Republicans in the Legislature rejected the core premise of the bill because it was “taking away rights.”

If approved by the voters in November, the traditional marriage law would take effect on March 31, 2013. If rejected, the Legislature would have time to take action against the original bill to preserve same-sex marriage. Bates said if the voters disapprove of the traditional marriage language at the ballot box, he and others would drop the issue.

Seamus Carty March 14, 2012 at 01:29 PM
The Supreme Court has not decided if it is unconstitutional or not. That was a lower court and that decision is being appealed. Votes have happened in 28 states. Why deny the people of NH the opportunity to vote on this redefinition of the word marriage? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage_in_the_United_States
saminnh March 14, 2012 at 01:33 PM
You are sadly way out of touch with reality dog. We are not living in Somalia, at least not yet. Who cares what your dead ancestors would think.
thytt March 15, 2012 at 01:22 AM
D-Dog, Interesting that you bring up grandparents.. Some are still around like my grandmother who has no issue with gay marriage. " the lord calls homosexuality an abomination" In case you forgot the Lord; Im not sure which one you speak of maybe Voldemort from Harry Potter, has no place in politics. Stop speaking for a book and having a book represent your opinions. Live Free or Die!! oh unless your gay
mark gross March 28, 2012 at 04:01 AM
Rep Bates needs to be unseated for his narrow minded views.........he probably is hiding some deep seated issue such as his closeted homosexuality.......doth those protest too much.....
Paul Mercury May 29, 2012 at 02:55 AM
@ Seamus "There have been votes in many states on gay marriage. If it were against the constitution, someone would have filed a lawsuit." How do you figure the issue got into the court system? http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/apr/10/couples-sue-overturn-nevada-gay-marriage-ban/ http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/11/us-usa-gaymarriage-nevada-idUSBRE83A0P320120411 http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/03/03/us-gaymarriage-massachusetts-idUSTRE52261H20090303 http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2012-02-22/new-jersey-gay-marriage-law-suit/53210200/1 There have been hundreds.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »