patching...
Update: It Takes 30 Seconds! Get Bedford's top news in your inbox every morning for FREE! Do it! Do it Now! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

POLL: Should Voter ID Be Required?

NH Legislature sees bill as way to prevent voting fraud. Do you agree?

 

Should Voter ID Be Required to vote in New Hampshire? Tell us why it should be or why it should not be, in the comment stream below.

Gov. John Lynch vetoed Senate Bill 289, a bill requiring voters to show a photo ID in order to vote.  In his veto message, he called it too restrictive.

Lynch also said he vetoed it because, under the bill, a person without photo ID for the upcoming primary and general election would have to complete a qualified voter affidavit. He said that would create confusion, "slow the voting process and may result in the inability of eligible voters to cast their vote." The League of Women Voters emerged this spring as one of the groups opposing the bill.

House Speaker William O'Brien, R-Mont Vernon, has made voter ID one of his legislative priorities. He insists fraud is poisoning the integrity of New Hampshire elections, and cites the James O'Keefe sting as an example.

The House/Senate convene Wednesday to take up veto messages, and several Republican candidates are working to muster enough votes to override the Lynch veto in this case.

  • POLL: Should Voter ID Be Required?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        1790 (86%)
    • No
        276 (13%)
    • I don't know
        14 (0%)
    Total votes: 2080
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Gov. John Lynch, House Speaker William O'Brien, James O'Keefe, Legislature, Voting, election 2012, and voter ID

William Smith

12:12 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Yes, it should.

The current system makes it much easier to commit voter fraud.

The notion that requiring identification to vote would make it more difficult is a joke considering all of the various things you can't do without ID.

Reply
Comment_arrow

News Flash

12:17 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Top line reason not to elect a democrat Governor

Comment_arrow

News Flash

12:20 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Democrats have a clear choice. Listen to the extreme lefties on Patch or the normal regular folks. The normal regular folks are tired of not being listened to.

Comment_arrow

News Flash

12:22 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Next watch all the phony claims of racism and bigotry. It is unbelivable to make that accusation to 90% of the population of NH.

Comment_arrow

News Flash

12:22 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Also coming up are the people posting from another state.

Comment_arrow

News Flash

12:24 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

By the way we live in America. Citizens have the right to vote, that vote should not be deluted by a morally and ethically corrupt democrat party.

Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

12:57 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

We were very close to a Voter I.D. bill this time. Sadly the Republican legislature fought to exclude college I.D. to suppress the college vote. The Governor was ready to sign this bill until Republicans, once again, chose to use voter I.D. legislation to suppress the vote.

Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

4:32 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

"Normal regular folks" is hereby defined as anyone from the crazy far right
extremists.

Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

4:35 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

I'm not laughing. Vote supresion is voter supression regardless.

Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

4:38 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

The far right Tea Party crazy extremists do not tally 9o% of the N.H. population.

Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

4:41 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Actually every American does have the right to vote. That's why we don't
want your voter suppression efforts. Thanks for making our point.

Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

4:44 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Most of those out of state people are republicans.

Comment_arrow

DLC

7:46 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

You have to show an ID if you;

Go into a bank to cash a check, ask for a loan and even if you want to open an account and give the Bank your money,
Set up an account with Comcast etc.
Set up electric service, gas service etc.
Apply for a credit card.
Set up a cellular account.
ETC. ETC. ETC.

Why are people afraid of Voter ID?
Because they are afraid of the outcome of a true and fair vote of American Citizens.

Comment_arrow

Jim Taylor

12:31 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Yes it should, you cant buy beer without an I.D., but you can vote without one gimme a f78king break.

Comment_arrow

Mark Jones

3:16 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Voter fraud is NOT running rampant across the United States. Ohio, rumored to have massive voter fraud had four cases brought up in the 2008 presidential election. Of those, three were the faults of the election officials in the various local precincts. The fourth was a college student who tried to vote in the city where his school was instead of at home where he was registered. The cost is way to expensive to implement. Why do Republicans want to cut government spending except in situations like this in which they have something to gain? Disfranchisement is unconstitutional.

Comment_arrow

Burguy

12:38 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

No kidding! i had to show my ID in order to return a shirt to Kohl's...I guess that's more important than verifying whether or not I'm a legitimate NH voter!!

Comment_arrow

Paul Tayer

9:41 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

those of you who have forgotten the histories....you are gonna drag us through the slime and mire again....why not just tattoo a bar code on all citizens arm....

Comment_arrow

Paul Tayer

9:48 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

fraud. what fraud? you all keep acting like there is some vast conspiracy to defraud the "true" voters. What evidence of fraud is there? None. And that includes anything you might want to make up. The system works fine as it is, adding road blocks is just a ploy to disenfranchise a small number of citizens with out drivers licenses....like my mother-in-law....

Comment_arrow

Kate B.

3:39 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Unfortunately, not every American DOES have the right to vote. Disenfranchised felon? No vote for you. Under 21, even if you're over 18 &, say, serving our country? No vote for you, either, even if our decisions send you to war. Unable to obtain citizenship? No for you, of course, & we'd also like to send you "home," even if you came here as a young child & didn't even realize you were illegal until you made it through high school with straight A's & tried to apply for college.

Comment_arrow

JIM

4:24 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

comrade paul please tell us your not stupid enough to equate voter ID with the Nazis tattooing the Jews that were in the concentration camps ..or are you ? as for YOUR mother in law not having a drivers licence be a good LiL son in law and give your monster in law a ride to get her ID , then comrade, when you give her a ride to vote she will be all set.

Comment_arrow

JIM

5:06 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Kate B , so you think felons should be able to vote ? and you do know that the only thing raised was the drinking age to 21 right ? 18 year olds can still vote, as long as there us citizens and ILLEGAL means ILLEGAL its not an age thing its an ILLEGAL thing....let me take a WILD guess here and go out on a limb and say ...your an obama supporter right ?, its always easy to tell

Mike Healey

1:00 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

We were so close to a logical Voter I.D. process, but republicans again tried to use the legislation to suppress the vote of demographics they don't like.
I fear that the Republican will continually chip away at the disenfranchised abilities to vote so they can keep majorities.
I CAN THINK OF NOTHING MORE UNAMERICAN THAN SUPPRESSING THE VOTE.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hardy Har Har Har

6:03 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Your ability to properly sort out the facts is in question. It has something to do with extreme liberalism.

Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

6:23 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Your ability to write discernible sentences is non existent.

Comment_arrow

Dennis Taylor

9:10 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Not even signing a bill allowing for the imprisonment of Americans without trial? Disenfranchising a few people cannot surely equal what Obama signed.

Comment_arrow

JIM

11:29 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

comrade mike, the reason for excluding college IDs is as plain as the red hammer and sickle flag hanging on your porch ,every kid in college has a college ID, out of state ,out of country, it dont matter they have a college ID, you keep pushing this college id as the reason for lynch to veto the bill, but the reasons for excluding this type of id is so obvious ..DAAS

Comment_arrow

Wayne Bertrand II

12:15 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The reason we're seeing so many Republican dominated states trying put an ID requirement for voting is simple and obvious. This last election, a large number of votes cast for Obama came from nonexistent or deceased people (most notably those "represented" by ACORN). At present, there is no way to tell if this had a significant impact on the election or not because without the use of voter ID, no one can tell how many false votes were cast. This isn't about suppressing the vote, it's about making sure that someone isn't trying to stack the vote by submitting more votes than they are legally entitled to cast.

Comment_arrow

Sid Guill

12:25 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Republicans don't want to stop anyone from voting once. It's the ones who vote several times we are trying to stop. You have to have an ID for everything you do. You democrats just don't like the ID because you want fraud. That's the only way Obama can get elected. There isn't enough either unimformed or stupid people to vote for him, so they pull this "Oh you are trying to suppress the vote "crap. You know it and I know it. If you don't understand that I can't help you.

Comment_arrow

Jim Taylor

12:44 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

with 11 million to 20 million illegals here in the US, you would rather they not show I.D.

Comment_arrow

Jim Taylor

12:46 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

What do you call suppressing the vote? Making everyone who votes have a valid I.D.

Comment_arrow

Darrell K.

12:54 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

sounds to me that your in favor of me and 500 friends showing up with a college ID(which you dont have to have a state issued ID to get) and voting in your elections. no? why not? you support some union showing up with 500 people from another state to vote in your district,not to mention all the dead people that suddenly rise out of their graves,look healthy and vote.

Debra Woodward

1:03 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

There is almost no voting fraud in America, and none of the lawmakers who claim there is have ever been able to document any but the most isolated cases. The only reason Republicans are passing these laws is to give themselves a political edge by suppressing Democratic votes. Of course the Republicans passing these laws never acknowledge their real purpose, which is to turn away from the polls people who are more likely to vote Democratic, particularly the young, the poor, the elderly and minorities. It has been a record year for new legislation designed to make it harder for Democrats to vote — 19 laws and two executive actions in 14 states dominated by Republicans, according to a new study by the Brennan Center for Justice. As a result, more than five million eligible voters will have a harder time participating in the 2012 election. Our voter turnout in this country is already pathetic (and many of those complaining don't even vote). This is a Democracy. We should encourage more citizens to vote. Maybe even hold elections on a Saturday.

Reply
Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

6:26 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Once again the Democrats have allowed an issue to get turned around backwards.
The issue is Election Fraud which is a far, far, far more serious crime than the virtually nonexistent act of voter fraud. Bush, over a period of five years fired seven attorneys trying to find examples of significant voter fraud and of course failed, because voter fraud, an individual act, is fundamentally irrational. Election fraud, on the other hand, is a deliberate attempt to alter large voting blocs or segments in effort to change the results of elections. A few, of many examples, are rigging voting machines, not counting voting blocs or closing polling places early. The worse example is voter disenfranchisement. Reducing early voting, reducing same day registration, stopping voter registration drives, and imposing voter ID laws while simultaneously then making it harder to obtain those ID's all of which are now being employed by the republicans.
So my question, Y.C.F.M.N. is how in hell did we allow [the nonexistent] "voter fraud"
[Rather than Election Fraud] to become headline news???????????????
www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html?page

Comment_arrow

Jim Taylor

12:53 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

You, you crack me up. No voter fraud lol. If no fraud is visible, then why do you care if the pollers ask for I.D.?

Comment_arrow

Gerald Black

5:18 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The study by the Brennan Center for Justice. That's your proof. Wake up! The Brennan Center is chaired by a member of the DNC. Of course, his report is going to say that. Stop drinking the kool-aid and get your facts straight.

News Flash

2:17 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Occupy NH has no position on the matter. Why? Well there are only 4/5 Occupy people left in NH. The ones that are left post to Patch but are ashamed and embarrassed to admit they were part of such a failure. You can tell whothey are by the crap and stupid arguments they present. What a bunch of losers.

Reply

Chris

2:48 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

The coming election is the most important election in your lifetime, and your childrens. One party lies all the time, anything to get their way. You better pay attention!!! Voter fraud, figure it out. Listen to Fox and MSNBC. I'll give you a hint. Who lies, Romney or Obama?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

6:24 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Romney? Its got to be Romney.

Comment_arrow

Dennis Taylor

8:56 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Just as a note on honesty, could we discuss how Obama's membership in the gay bath house known as "Man's Country" in Chicago in the 1990s is consistent with his intentional portrayal of himself as a heterosexual husband and father. An honest candidate would have run as gay or bisexual.

Comment_arrow

Jan Schmidt

9:20 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Chris, try this... turn off your TV and get your information from the internet - news sites only - not fox and not msnbc - nothing that is "entertainment" and stay off the opinion pages. Try it for a month, and talk with people who you don't agree 100%, listen more, read... try it for a month.

Comment_arrow

Seamus Carty

9:32 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Chris, Jan Schmidt is running for office in Nashua. As there is no detection system in place for voter fraud, anyone can pick a name out of the phonebook and vote for or against Jan. FYI...

Comment_arrow

Jan Schmidt

6:37 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Seamus - what are you afraid of? That Chris will start deciding for himself instead of having the media hand him his opinions?

There is no voter fraud in NH.
The bill was an attempt to limit voters to the main streaam only and disenfranchise others.
If this was a serious attempt to make sure only citizens voted then the state would first issue citizens the IDs they'd need.

Comment_arrow

Jan Schmidt

6:49 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Dennis,
Honesty? hahahahahaha

Comment_arrow

JIM

11:32 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Chris, the correct answer as to who lies would be ......any politician looking for your vote

Comment_arrow

tcjumps

11:53 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Really Jan? If it's on the internet, you're saying it must be true? God help the voters of Nashua!

Comment_arrow

Jan Schmidt

7:02 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Wow, tc - you sure can jump to conclusions.

The poster is using 2 large media corporations to form his opinions for him. If you get your info from thousands of sources instead - AND ACTUALLY FORM YOUR OWN OPINION - you're much better off.

The power of corporate media today is stunning - even their "news" is carefully formatted to give you their approved talking points.

Bob Gibbs

8:35 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

Yes! What more needs to be said

Reply

Keith F Thompson

10:20 pm on Saturday, June 23, 2012

No, voter ID should not be required.
Why? Because it's not needed. Because it serves to suppress votes. Because it singles out people who are likely to vote for one party. Because it it's not the same as cashing a check or boarding an airplane. Because there really are people for whom obtaining an ID would be an undue burden. Because proving your identity once for the town clerk should be enough, because town clerks are impartial, and have no interest in preventing voters from voting. Because instituting it is part of the tea party republican plan to consolidate their hold on our state.
Here's a word of advice to those concerned about being labeled a racist or bigot for advocating voter ID: if you find those labels so distasteful, stop advocating for policies designed solely for the purpose of disenfranching the poor, minorities, the young, the elderly and our active duty military.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JIM

3:34 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

keith did you copy that crap right off the commiecrat web page ? so there is no voter fraud because you say there isn't any right ? sorry comrade, the only voters disenfranchised by having to show an ID are the illegal voters

Comment_arrow

Keith F Thompson

1:21 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Jim, unlike you, I can write my own opinion without copying it from a website.
Commiecrat, how creative and mature.
Even if there were proof of voter fraud, which there is none, but if there were, it doesn't automatically follow that voter ID would stop it, and it doesn't mean the main purpose of the tea party republicans isn't voter suppression.
I know, logical thinking without name calling and expletives seem foreign to you. Maybe there are a few people who deserve their right to vote restricted after all. What town(s) do you vote in, Jim?

Comment_arrow

Keith F Thompson

2:16 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

GOP Chairman in Pennsylvania makes major mistake (especially for a republican)- he tells the truth, voter ID is designed to deliver PA for Romney. Boy, do all you deniers look silly now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=87NN5sdqNt8

Comment_arrow

JIM

6:19 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

keith how many towns do you vote in ? your the one that's crying that they might actually crack down on voter fraud. The voter suppression and racist or being a bigot BS is just more made up talking points by the left who are fearful their illegal dead and felon voters wont be able to get out and support you democrats... like I said the ONLY voters disenfranchised by voter ID are the ILLEGAL voters

Michael Duhart

6:02 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Yes - This requirement will establish an understanding that every individual citizen of the united stares of America with weight of importance how much their freedom of choice really does count. Most individuals do not think their vote counts due to the questionable voting practices which have been hyped by media coverage over the past national elections. This is not party bias issue. This will try to re-establish the integrity to all the we believe that everyone citizen should exercise their right to vote knowing that it not just a political posture, but their voice can be heard.

Reply

Everett Edmunds

8:22 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

First question is voting a right or a privilege? I view it as a right , I have voted in every general, Presidential , primary election from Nov of 1968 as I boarded a plane en route to Bien Hoa, Vietnam. Now they are going to disenfranchise me me because I am registered and I WILL REFUSE to show a photo ID in order to vote, I earned this Constitutional right and will not give in to the fear mongers and charlatans who never served their country, but decided I must give in to an oppressive government act, "Live free or Die", Where are U Republicans now that Government is intruding on our freedom??

Reply
Comment_arrow

JIM

12:31 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Everett,thank you for your service to your country, that said , if you dont want to vote because you have to prove you are who you say you are ,dont vote, nobody cares, there is a difference between being disenfranchised and being stupid, how is the government intruding on your freedom by asking you for an ID to vote ? sorry ,your argument makes no sense plain and simple. You would think after having fought for this Constitutional right you would be less apt to just hand it to someone who might get to the poll before you and cast a vote on your ballot, it is naive to think there is no voter fraud ,its human nature to want your team to win or your guy to win, to think that some people would not revert to cheating to make this happen is naive.Every illegal vote cancels out a legal vote and one illegal vote is one two many

Comment_arrow

Jim Taylor

1:02 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

If you have nothing to hide showing your I D wouldnt bother you so much.

Comment_arrow

Don

9:30 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Everett, the right to bear arms is also a constitutionally protected right. To bear arms one must show a photo ID, submit to a background check, pay a fee, and submit to another background check. If I want to bear arms out of state I will pay thousands of dollars, jump through unimaginable layers of red tape, and still often be denied my constitutionally protected right. Why is it that we must show a photo ID to exercise other constitutionally protected rights but not the right to vote?

Karen Davidson

8:23 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

EVeryone seems to be forgetting that in 1965 Congress passed the Voting Act. All states are to follow that, and if there is a proposed change, it must be approved by Congress. Now since 1965 this Voting Act has been the standard for states to follow. Why hasn't any state challenged this when Nixon, Ford, Clinton, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush and when McCain and Obama ran in 2008? Because there is a group of people who think that there is wide spread voting fraud. Probably the biggest voter fraud came in Florida with the hanging chads. Funny, the democrats didn't start a movement at that time for new voting procedures. Also check out what are the requirements in some towns and cities in NH today. You have to prove that it is you who is registering to vote.

Reply

Heath

8:39 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

ACORN was charged and found guilty of voter fraud. Absolutely, an ID should be required without a question.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Everett Edmunds

9:04 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

How many people in NH have been indicted for voter fraud in every election in this and the past centuries? What are the numbers? What % of people eligible do in fact vote? You want only the elite, the "educated" to vote ? Remember when a poll tax was required to keep blacks from voting or how about prior to 1919 when onlly white male property owners could vote, is that what you want to go back to?

Comment_arrow

Sid Guill

12:28 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

You are right. This isn't 1919 anymore is it? Don't give me that it's hard to get an ID The democrats just want a way to cheat. That's the only way Obama gets back in.

Comment_arrow

Wayne Bertrand II

1:47 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Everett:
Heath said nothing about restricting people from being able to vote, just that they show their ID when they vote. This is all about trying to prevent voter fraud.

Comment_arrow

Don

9:37 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

If you can't verify legitimate voters how do you count the number of illegal votes? With the line of thinking that we shouldn't do anything about an obvious problem then we would ban police departments to stop crime. The whole notion is intellectually bankrupt.

Tammy

9:04 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

ACORN did not engage in voter fraud. Some of their registration canvassers did submit forms with names like Donald Duck, Mickey Mouse and such in order to increase the pay. ACORN themselves alerted the election board and turned in the individuals for prosecution in most cases.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sid Guill

12:39 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Acorn didn't engage in voter fraud? What have you been smoking. I saw people on TV that said Acorn signed them up 70 times. A bunch of them got caught. The question is how many did they get away with?

Comment_arrow

Gerald Black

1:30 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012

ACORN did engage in voter fraud, they were able to hang their people out to dry for it and try to deflect the blame. The main the democrats do not want voter id is it will kill them from using buses to travel there union cronies to vote at several different sites under different names. Voter id will kill the democrats and then all of their lies will have to stop. If the illegals can't vote, cartoon characters can't vote, and the dead can't vote, people like Pelosi knows her cush job with all the fixings is gone. If you need an id for everything else these days then why not for voting. The kool aid drinkers of the democrats need to look else where for the reason they are going to get their clocks cleaned in November, like lieing to the people, or just not doing their jobs they were elected to do.

Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

2:20 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012

If you consider what ACORN has done fraud, than the Republican Party should be disbanded too.

Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

2:21 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012

Dear Tammy,
Submitting incorrect forms is not "voter fraud".

Just my 2 cents

10:02 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Let’s say voter ID should be required. You need a license to drive, ID to use a bank or credit card, ID to buy alcohol. The difference is, these laws have been in place for a long long time. People have been informed that ID's are necessary for their entire lives. The question people must think about, is why all of a sudden is vote ID bills so urgent to get passed this year, right now? Why not give this new voter ID effort a few years to transition into law? Wouldn't it be fair to give everyone plenty of time and notice to understand the new law and have plenty of time to get some form of accepted ID? Do I need to answer this question.... or is the truth now revealed?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sid Guill

12:44 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

This isn't an all of a sudden thing . People have been pushing this for years. How long does it take anyway? This really should have been done all along. They are finding dead voters all the time. We live in an age where people can't be trusted. Obama will get in by any means possible and you know he will. There are people in jail right now that voted for him multiple times. How many didn't get caught. Also ,these peoples votes counted even though they are in jail didn't they? If Obama gets re-elected so be it, but let it be fair. One vote per person.

Comment_arrow

Jim Taylor

1:07 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

It is Sunday and i can get an I D tomorrow. What is the big deal about it? If you want your vote to count and you dont have an I D go get one.

Gordon Leedy

10:13 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The proponents of restricting the right to vote committed voter fraud to prove their point. The fact that one could commit voter fraud doesnt prove that it's occurring in any but the most isolated instances. When I go to the polls, the folks working there generally know who I am. This is just another example of the "freedom" advocates ginning up another conspiracy theory to frighten people and justify their agenda of limiting political participation to those who agree with their point of view.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JIM

11:45 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

they did not commit voter fraud ...no votes were cast ,they merely asked for ballots for people who were dead and after the poll workers offered them the ballots they refused them because they had no ID, in order for it to be voter fraud they would have had to have taken the ballot fill it out and submit it

Richard Nichols

10:26 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Is there any audit associated with Patch Polls to determine if there are duplicate IP or MAC addresses?

Reply
Comment_arrow

JIM

12:10 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

no Richard , there is no voter ID system on the patch polls so anyone can vote multiple times with the same IP address......now ,if only there was some form of voter ID to stop people from committing voter fraud in these polls, then they would be reliable

Gary Patton

10:52 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Voter photo ID is simply a Republican scam designed to suppress voting among Democratic constituencies (e.g., minorities, students, the poor, the handicapped) who are less likely to have the required forms of identification (Oh no, not just any form of ID will do - only ones that discriminate against key Democratic constituencies ) . There is NO evidence that has EVER been presented that anything more than isolated and trivial voter fraud is occurring. A study in NH found only ONE case. Significant voter fraud exists only in the minds of conniving Republican politicians and the overactive, slightly paranoid imaginations of the Far Right.This malicious cure is far worse than any alleged disease.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JIM

11:40 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

so Gary what are you trying to tell us? are you trying to tell us that democrat voters such as yourself are so stupid , they couldn't handle the relatively easy task of obtaining a voter ID ?

Comment_arrow

ToWittandTherefore

2:05 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Believe it or not Gary, It's the law, and it's a fenolny to commit voter fraud.

P.S U R full of it

Comment_arrow

ToWittandTherefore

2:12 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Next, you're going to claim that there are voting booths in prisons. Get real!

Comment_arrow

Terry Munroe

10:09 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

I have a question then, if it is simply a Republican scam....why did delegates at the DNC need ID to get in?

steve

10:52 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I have to show an ID to get a sticker for the town dump. On a scale of one to ten in importance I would say voting is far more important than a dump sticker...

Reply

Catherine Ackerman

10:53 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Yes to voter ID. It is just common sense to validate who you are when entering the polls. Arguments that think this is an effort to suppress voting don't stand up in light of all the nonsense that people/groups have done to cast doubt in peoples minds on this issue. Example: not allowing dead people to be removed from voting lists! Why?
Presenting ID is a way of life. Not requiring it expands doubt. If one seriously does not have ID then it's time to do something about it!

Reply

c. vandenberg

11:07 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

As a foreign born naturalized citizen. I had to carry my green card with me at all times. Was not aloud to give any political opinion in public. I belief it is a must to avoid voters fraud to have a legitimate id card before we can vote. (When did the law change that anybody at anytime can vote with some sort of idea) Even in Egypt thay had to show legitimate id before they were aloud to vote.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Terry Munroe

10:11 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

aloud means to say something. what you mean is "allowed" Not to be mean, simply assuming you want your English to be correct. English is a tough language.

Brian Woodard

11:28 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I do not know why people are so up in arms about showing ID when they vote . we do it here in Ohio and no problems have arisen

Reply

Jack Conaway

11:40 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

There is negligible voter fraud in NH. James O'Keefe, a forceable entry criminal and expert at distortion of reality and his Project Veritas team of punkers was invited here by our Republican legislature to prove otherwise, but was caught in the middle of violating NH election laws. He should be prosecuted.

The issue has been fabricated by Republicans because they fear a gradual drift to progressive values among the young and seniors who are awakening to the fact that Medicare may be the only thing standing between them and financial ruin in their retirement years.

This is part of a nationwide campaign from ALEC that is trying to implant boilerplate voter registration laws in 27 states. This and the Project Veritas invasion are just two more examples of outside meddling in the affairs of NH citizens.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sid Guill

12:36 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Jack. You don't really know what kind of voter fraud might happen in November do you? If you do, can you send me some lottery numbers? Fight voter ID says one thing to me. "We can't cheat as easy if we have that." What are guys worried about that Obama can't get elected if he doesn't cheat? You need an ID to do about anything. You guys know this. There are people in jail that voted multiple times for Obama. One is tahead of a Planned Parent Hood chapter . I believe she voted 35 times. We need this ID law everywhere. Apparently democrats can't be trusted or we wouldn't need it.

Comment_arrow

Don

4:19 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Negligible voter fraud in NH? How would we know? We use the honor system. Unless someone confesses to voter fraud there is no enforceable crime committed. How many criminals seek out the authorities and give a full confession? It is nothing short of crazy and irresponsible to use the honor system to determine who is and who is not an eligible voter.

JIM

11:49 am on Sunday, June 24, 2012

BLACK PEOPLE ARE TO STUPID TO GET A VOTER ID !!!!!! ….. this is what the communist democrats think of their voting base, if your a black , YOUR AN IDIOT !!!!, and therefore not smart enough to grasp the reasoning or intellect to obtain a voter ID, if your Hispanic , YOUR A DUMB Az !!!! and therefore not smart enough to be able to perform the simple task of obtaining a voter ID , if your an American Indian ,YOUR A MORON !!!!, and dont have the brain power needed to get yourself a govt voter ID, if your an ORIENTAL, YOUR AS DUMB AS A STUMP and its not worth our time to explain it to you or your time to even try to figure out how to go about getting a FREE voter ID !!!!!
if your old ....YOUR BRAIN IS MUSH !!!!!! and you are not competent enough to get an ID, IF YOUR A DEMOCRAT VOTER , YOU ARE AN IDIOT, THE COMMUNIST DEMOCRAT PARTY LOOKS AT YOU AND TO YOUR FACE CALLS YOU THE DUMBEST LIFE FORM IN THIS COUNTRY, AND WHAT DO YOU DO ……. that’s right, you crawl to the polls time after time and give THE SLAVE MASTERS OF THE COMMUNIST DEMOCRAT PARTY YOUR VOTE , the superior thinkers of the communist democrat party thank you …….you know, come to think of it, the communist democrats are right !!! you BLACKS, ORIENTALS , HISPANICS, OLD FOLKS AND NATIVE AMERICANS who vote democrat ............ ARE ALL A BUNCH OF IDIOTS

Reply
Comment_arrow

Everett Edmunds

12:04 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Jim: You obviously are a very sick individual. Interesting that when I took an oath to serve my country and fight in Vietnam they said there were those like yourself that one wouldn't want to protect, but must. My deepest sympathies to you and your hatred! E Edmunds

Comment_arrow

ForThePeople

12:50 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Say no to bigotry and hatred.

Vote against fear and loathing 2012.

Comment_arrow

JIM

12:52 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Everett I do not now nor have I ever needed your protection , there is no hatred in my post I am just pointing out what you democrats think of each other, As someone who fought the communist in Nam you would think you would be disgusted at the communists that have taken over your party.

Comment_arrow

JIM

1:12 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

for the sheeple ,does that mean your not voting for obama this time around

Comment_arrow

FreedomAlways

10:26 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Jim,
Let me break this down for you.. I hope this helps you and others on this page:

Race has nothing to do with obtaining an ID, unless your race has somehow placed you in a financial situtation that makes the $10 requirement to obtain a non-driver ID in NH a burden($50 for a driver's license), plus the cost of obtaining the documents required to get one: http://www.nh.gov/safety/divisions/dmv/forms/documents/identification-residency.pdf

Being elderly can also place one in a category where it is a financial burden, and may as well be a burden to find a ride to the DMV, of which there is not an abundance of if you don't live near a big city in NH (and we don't have public transportation).

Open your mind and kill the caps lock. It does you no justice.

Comment_arrow

JIM

7:10 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

Freedom Always, the post points out exactly what the democrats think of the people they claim to represent , your right voter ID has NOTHING to do with race I NEVER said it did ! but the commiecrats continually make it about race or age or gender or what ever fits their agenda the day there making voter ID a talking point, dont play the cost game with me , it costs peanuts to obtain an ID and then dont play the I dont drive game, because if a person can get a ride to vote they can get a ride to get an ID. And just to let you know how a keyboard works cap lock means your caps are locked on and EVERYTHING you type is in caps, go back and read my post slowly and with an open mind and you will see that obviously my cap lock was not on. Your post does you no JUSTICE.

Comment_arrow

Don

4:29 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Freedomalways, Anyone that has the capacity to get to the polls has equal capacity to get a photo ID. That argument is intellectually bankrupt. As to the cost of the IDs what part of free is it exactly that you don't get? There is no good reason not to require voter ID. Most people in this country don't vote because they think their vote doesn't count. We need voter ID if for no other reason than to return confidence in the integrity our elections to the people of New Hampshire.

P J Greusel

12:48 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Of course, identification should be required. It's ridiculous to think that any other country would allow non-citizens/non registered voters to vote .... why should we do anything differently. Voter fraud needs to be stopped. Every legal vote should count ... but only legal votes.

Reply

Everett Edmunds

1:09 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Liberterian Jim not Rep or Democrat, know the difference because both parties intrude on our God given & constitutional rights!

Reply
Comment_arrow

JIM

1:33 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Everett, I'm a registered independent and you still have not explained how asking for an ID to vote intrudes on your God given or Constitutional rights , you cant trust the govt to clear the voter rolls of felons and dead people that's been proven and you cant trust people to not commit voter fraud, so to ask a voter for ID insures we have an honest election, what the hell is so hard to understand about this ?

Comment_arrow

JIM

1:42 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Everett I have to ask you ,do you think a person should be required to obtain a concealed weapon permit to carry a hand gun ? I know this has nothing to do with voter ID

Everett Edmunds

1:17 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I don't have anything to hide, but I don't want the police coming into my house to search, or into my tax records or looking into my background..just because you might have nothing to hide , it still is no damn business of any government agency to look, search, (See Watergate!)

Reply

Paul

1:37 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Disenfranchising even one voter violates the civil rights of all of us. There are many seniors who do not have photo identification. My mother is 90 and has not had a driver's license in years. There are other ways to prove who you are, your electric bill, your social security card. Photo id's are about voter suppression. If you think otherwise you are either a fool or part of the problem!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Wayne Bertrand II

1:53 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

My best friend, while not a senior citizen, doesn't drive or have a driver's license. That said, he DID take the time to go to the OMV to acquire a legal state ID that looks identical to a driver's license but has ID stamped across it in large visible letters. That is just as legal a means of ID as a driver's license, so he can still vote. It's easy to call someone a fool who doesn't agree with you, but lit doesn't make it true. Photo ID is NOT about voter suppression, it's about making sure that the situation is truly one vote per person.

Comment_arrow

JIM

2:16 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Paul ,not doing everything possible to insure there is no voter fraud violates my civil rights to a fair and honest election. My Dads 87 still drives and thinks voter ID is a must ,how does a photo ID suppress voters , you say your mom doesn't drive ,how does she get to the polls to vote ? if you drive her to the polls then you can also give her a ride to get her voter ID, the voter suppression BS is a made up argument by democrats nothing more ,the only voters it will suppress are the illegal ones and if you think otherwise you are either a fool or part of the problem !

Comment_arrow

Hangtough

4:03 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

I am not a fool or part of the problem. How hard would it be for your mother to go have her picture taken? Unless she is bedridden I would think that could be done. If she can go vote she should be able to go have a picture taken. You say she shoud be able to "show" an electric bill or social security card then I assume she is not voting absentee.

Comment_arrow

Don

4:32 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Perhaps you can explain how it is that someone with the capacity to get to the polls possibly several times a year somehow lacks equal capacity to obtain a photo ID once every five years? That argument is intellectually bankrupt.

Terry Bradshaw

1:37 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

It only makes sense to require a photo ID to prevent voter fraud.

Reply

ToWittandTherefore

2:01 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

It's just a democratic ruse to complain about ID, but think back to whom was crying fowl in Florida over hanging chads, and unregistered voters. Be legal, Be registered and vote! I served this country to protect our rights, please use them wisely. God Bless

Reply
Comment_arrow

Wayne Bertrand II

2:05 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Bravo, well said! And thank you for serving, there are still many of us who haven't served but still respect and appreciate those of you who have.

JOHNNY B GOODE

2:24 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

IMAGINE, IF YOU CAN, A POLITICAL PARTY DEPENDANT ON ILLEGAL VOTES AND UNION KICKBACKS......PARTY ABOVE COUNTRY

Reply

Hangtough

3:53 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

The only people objecting to this are the Dems. I guess since it is common sense it is hard for them to understand. You have to have ID to get a DL, utilities, job, food stamps and welfare, so where is the problem. Are they afraid thier people are too lazy to go get ID's if they don't already have them. It has nothing to do with disenfranchising voters, it is all about voter fraud. It is hard to commit fraud when you have to have a picture ID. Personally I would love to see them use fingerprints!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Burguy

2:15 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

Democrats don't really care about their constituents except on election day. They don't really care whether or not their constituents can fully participate in the day to day transactions of life in America, being able to do things like cash a check, legally buy alcohol or cigarettes, get a credit card, etc--they only care that, on one day, every two or four years, they can get those undocumented voters out to support whatever democrat candidate is running. After that, those illegal voters have served their purpose, and they should just sink back into the anonymity from which they came, to be forgotten until the next election, safely back on their respective "reservations," with just enough food, money, or "fire water" to keep them placated and in the democrat fold.

Comment_arrow

Don

4:36 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Not Democrats in general, most of them want voter ID too. No, it's just the party leadership and they are in lock step with the radical leftists in the party. I'm hoping the reasonable moderate Democrats in this state take back control of their party or have the courage to help us defeat them.

LJoel Hackbart

4:28 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Yes imagine. With the aid of a powerful republican spin machine funded by
large corporate donors whose money overwhelmingly dwarfs any union money,
imagine some vast conspiracy of large numbers of people casting illegal votes in an attempt to swing elections. Let your imagination run wild. Close your eyes and really
let go. Now when you wake up from your fantasy, you well realize, study after exhausting study show absolutely no evidence of statistically significant vote fraud whatsoever. Plenty of evidence of election fraud and voter disenfranchisement on the other hand. but who cares about reality- we're having a GOP fantasy here!

www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html?...all
www.reclaimdemocracy.org/articles/2011/voter_fraud_myths.php
www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/?GCOI=80140100774960
www.truthaboutfraud.org/

Reply
Comment_arrow

JIM

7:30 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

comrade Lil joe da hack ,how convenient that you dont mention hollyweed or Soros or any of the other billionaires or money machines that always support the commiecrats, your a hoot .

Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

7:08 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

Oh Jim the whack please,
That was a truly a lame response even by the pitifully low bar you already set.
If I'm a "hoot' than you are downright insanely hysterical. I’m laughing so hard I
barely type! OK. I'll try playing along with your fantasy as well. Say that 17 of the top
20 donors in this election cycle are NOT conservative leaning. Say conservative donors DO NOT outspend liberal donors by four to one. Say Soros and Hollywood
and unions we're not overwhelming out spent by the Koch Brothers, Adelison, Peterson, Rove and Americans for prosperity ECT. ECT. ECT. Let’s say ALEC was NOT
corrupting our political system. Let’s say Murdoch has NOT established a media
Empire throughout the USA. [Remember we're fantasizing here!!]
Than explain why then on God’s green earth, would conservatives not want to
repeal Citizens United and get ALL outside money out of politics and clean up the Media? Why?
To answer that question, it’s time to end the fantasy and wake up to reality once
again. The answer. Because 17 of the top 20 donors ARE conservative leaning!
Because conservative donors DO outspend liberal donors by four to one! Because
ALEC IS corrupting our political system! Because Rupert Murdoch HAS a media
Empire here in the USA that's why!!!!!!!!! You keep fantasizing and keep me laughing at you!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment_arrow

JIM

6:32 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

comrade Lil joe ,I hope you didn't laugh so hard you wet yourself ..again. If you liberals and OWS losers got off your couch's got a job and did something with your lives then perhaps you could be in the top 20 donors list and outspend the republicans . Its kinda hard to donate your welfare check, you days pan handeling intake or your beer money to an election campaign and expect it to make a difference...OK LIl joe you can go back to ROTF

Comment_arrow

Don

4:38 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

With elections often being determined by a handful of votes especially in local elections even a few ineligible votes can tip the balance. Our elections are too important to allow even one fraudulent vote. This argument is intellectually bankrupt.

Comment_arrow

LJoel Hackbart

6:09 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Jim the whack,
OMG So now you tack on yet another paranoid delusion of yours. [That everyone who puts you in your place is sitting at home drawing welfare] You sure do have a lot of them. Maybe you should lay off the GOP LSD. No Jim. We everyday people that live in the real world and earn an honest living cannot outspend Oil Barons and Hedge Fund Managers, much less Multi-National Corporations. But then again, because you’re too stupid to figure that out, go ahead, kick back and take your drugs.
BTW- YOU ARE A BIG JOKE AND YOU ARE BEING LAUGHED AT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sue Mercier Vail

9:11 pm on Sunday, June 24, 2012

Why don't we vote as a state on this in November. It should be on the ballot.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JIM

7:16 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

Suzanne how convenient to vote to stop voter fraud after it happen es , why dont we put gay marriage on the ballot instead

William Blonda

3:16 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

What's the problem, unless you have something to hide, show your id. it will keep the illegals from voting. as far as Obama or Romney goes they both lie like hell.

Reply

Big Joe

8:48 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

Everything DLC said is true.
Except that all of those instances are not rights.
Buying a car, getting credit, cashing a check, getting cable, etc., those are all privileges.
Voting is a RIGHT, and should not be interfered with, especially in light of the fact that the only reported case of what might be "voter fraud" in NH is when Speaker Obrien's son admitted to voting in two states.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kevin Polley

10:07 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

Thanks Big Joe for pointing out what should be obvious to the trolling majority in this comment section. Voting is a constitutional right. In my opinion, any efforts to impede my or ANY other American's rights, be they of ANY political affiliation, should be swiftly removed from the table. I'm already registered to vote, but if I am asked to present ID at the polling place I will kindly refuse and if denied I will bring about a civil lawsuit against the State of NH for denying me my CIVIL RIGHT to vote.
If I others are denied I will make certain it becomes a class action suit.

Comment_arrow

JIM

3:10 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

comrade big joe, what about my right to a fair and honest election where I dont have to worry about some dead man casting an illegal vote that will negate my legal vote you commiecrats think your the only ones with rights

Comment_arrow

JIM

3:24 pm on Monday, June 25, 2012

comrade kevin if it becomes a law you go right ahead son and refuse to cast your vote be a man ,show em who's boss march right out of the polling place and straight to a lawyers office and you start that class action law suit that will go nowhere please take all the commiecrat obama supporters with you tell them not to vote if their forced to show ID ...the ONLY voters disenfranchised by voter ID are the illegal voters.......who by the way will have to show ID to take part in comrade kevin pees law suit ...you guys are a laugh a minute

Comment_arrow

Don

4:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Bearing arms is a right and I have to show a photo ID, submit to a background check, pay a fee, and submit to another background check. If I want to bear arms outside of New Hampshire I will have to pay thousands of dollars, struggle through unimaginable red tape, and I will still have my right denied to me in many states. Anyone who has the capacity to get to the polls has equal capacity to get a photo ID.

Terry Munroe

9:52 am on Monday, June 25, 2012

I have no doubt Obama will be re-elected. After all, Soros owns the company that will be counting the ballots. Having and ID to vote won't make any difference.

Reply

Keith F Thompson

2:16 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

GOP Chairman in Pennsylvania makes major mistake (especially for a republican)- he tells the truth, voter ID is designed to deliver PA for Romney. Boy, do all you deniers look silly now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=87NN5sdqNt8

Reply
Comment_arrow

Don

4:45 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Given the massive vote fraud in Pennsylvania in 2008 it probably will result in exactly that with fair elections.

JIM

5:57 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

WoW keith you got all that from a 6 second sound bite ? well this is what I got .
With voter ID in PA the dead PA voters ,the felons and the illegals wont be able to vote for obama and that will give President Romney a win in PA...and that my boy is the truth !!

Reply

NHPeter

4:46 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

First, I am going to contact my state leg and Gov to support the current bill. Secondly, too much anti-Republican rhetoric in this stream of comments. New Hampshire is 1/3rd R, 1/3rd D and 1/3rd I. Curbing voter fraud is everyone’s concern regardless of party. As Democratic members we should be holding our election rights in the highest esteem. Using a college ID is NOT a valid form of ID. Can you get a credit card using a college ID? Can you apply for welfare with a college ID? Can you buy beer with a college ID? No, No, and no…

If you take the Poll of the 1739 voted in favor of ID that means 580 R, 580 D, 579 I are in FAVOR of ID’s. It would be interested to poll the next level of questioning Do you think Student ID’s are a valid form of Voting ID?

Voter fraud flash back 2008 - Acorn registering Mickey Mouse and the 7 Dwafts

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

2:38 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012

Submitting false or incomplete registration forms is not "voter fraud".

The California Secretary of State's Election Fraud Division is now reportedly investigating a firm hired by the Sacramento County Republican Party said to have submitted 7500 fraudulent voter registration forms.

The GOP must be disbanded immediately.

Richard Williams

11:18 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012

If the state wants people to have an ID, then the state should make provisions to take the potential voter to get an ID card. Lets face it, many senior citizens do not have a drivers license. It is just another way the stupid Republicians and tea parters are trying to make it difficult for the black Americans and Latinos to vote. I agree 100% with NHPeter. The Republician party is disgusting and un American. We have a good and also intelligent president in Obama. The Republicians are gealous that Obama won the election in 2008. I am a Democrat, the party that is fo the middle class of Americans, God help our great country if Mitt ever gets elected. He is fior the mighty rich. Mitt should also pay his required taxes.
NHRichard

Reply
Comment_arrow

C Barry

11:36 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012

More democrat hogwash, or outright lies.

Comment_arrow

Mike Healey

2:31 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012

The good news Richard is that you still are not required to have an I.D. to vote.
If you show up at the polls without an I.D. that will just have you sign an affidavit and have your picture taken and you will get to vote.
After the election, they will send a letter to the address you gave and ask that you return the verification card.
If you don't return the verification card, they will send a sheriff by to check on you.

Honestly it all sounds like a lot of fun, I may forget my I.D. just to get to meet a sheriff.

Sylvan Tieger

3:27 pm on Sunday, August 26, 2012

NYC had an election for a school board member. After the elections they found out a dead man had voted 7 times.. Darn good thing they found out he died 3 years before the election other wise he would still be voting over and over

The sad part was social security found out and stopped payments of his monthly checks

Reply

Sylvan Tieger

3:28 pm on Sunday, August 26, 2012

NYC had an election for a school board member. After the elections they found out a dead man had voted 7 times.. Darnn good thing they found out he died 3 years before the election other wise he would still be voting over and over

The sad part was social security found out and stopped payments of his monthly checks

Reply

News Flash

5:56 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

NH Dem Convention Attendee-Don’t Forget Your Photo ID
Anyone from New Hampshire who plans on attending the Democrat National Convention had best be prepared to show some ID. That’s right, no elderly, young, poor, or vulnerable persons, you know the ones the Democrats claim will be prevented from voting if we ask them to show an ID at the polls, will be allowed to attend the Democrat National Convention…because according to Democrats at least…they do not have it and it is simply to much of a burden for them to get it.

http://granitegrok.com/blog/2012/09/new-hampshire-democrat-convention-attendees-dont-forget-your-photo-id

Reply

Sylvan Tieger

6:16 pm on Monday, September 3, 2012

The only wany we can get our democraps to stay in office is to allow anyone to vote .. Several times if needed Nancy Pelosi still refuses to be drug tested .. Hellery Clinton also needs to have her urine sampled as no one can be the way they are with medications in their blood stream IMHO

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rick

9:44 pm on Tuesday, September 25, 2012

More baloney from Faux Noise.

Leave a comment