Huckabee: Birther 'Not Even on the Table'
Despite claims from NH Dems, Mike Huckabee says he has no reason to doubt Barack Obama's American citizenship.
In a prebuttal to tonight's New Hampshire GOP Victory Dinner, the state's Democratic Party tried to link Mike Huckabee with Donald Trump in contesting whether President Obama was born outside the United States.
"After Donald Trump campaigned with Mitt Romney in Las Vegas, now the Romney birther surrogate tour comes to NH – with Mike Huckabee who has been questioning where President Obama grew up," said Raymond Buckley, chairman of the New Hampshire Democratic Party. "Recycling a debunked out of touch claim to distract from the real issues in this election seems to be the Republican strategy for 2012."
Not so fast, said Huckabee.
"I'm far less concerned with where Obama came from, than where he is taking the country. That's my concern, not the past, the future," said Huckabee, a 2008 GOP presidential hopeful. "But I have no reason to doubt that he was born in Hawaii, that he's an American citizen. To me that's not even on the table.
"You know what, that just shows how wrong the Democrats are about that and about everything else they've been promoting the last four years," he added. "And it's another good reason, since they can't get even the simplest facts right, to make sure they're not in charge and in power the next four years."
Huckabee also dismissed his 2008 primary feud with Mitt Romney and urged Republicans to unite behind the GOP presidential nominee.
Follow Bedford Patch on our Facebook page , Twitter feed , and daily newsletter and breaking news alerts.
dgd ghdd
5:39 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
thats what pelosi said about bush when he sunk this nation into war from lies and treason that his impeachments offf the table now you now they are hiding something
jrterrier5
8:33 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
The Senate authorized Bush to go to war in Iraq, with a majority of both DEMS and REPS voting in favor. So, please stop blaming only Bush. Both parties were complicit in that disaster. Even Sen Kerry, who later became the DEM presidential candidate voted to go to war in Iraq.
Jim
11:51 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
You mean the same war that Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, Tom Daschle and the rest of the dems as well as 30 countries authorised? They all saw the same evidence..People neglect to remember that Saddam ws killing 100,000 of his own citizens/ year..It was not all about WMD's which by the way, were in fact there...
Colleen Harper
12:40 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Wjrterrier5
The Senate only voted to give Bush authorization to pursue whatever responses he deemed necessary. There was NEVER a clear declaration of war from either branch of the Legislature.
HowthCastle
1:56 am on Saturday, June 2, 2012
And where we're the WMD? (Real ones I mean, not the cobble rocks, ball-peen hammers and fungo bats of mass destruction.)
David Farrar
7:54 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
That's one reason why Huckabee is a political loser. He doesn't understand the importance of the Birther issue and our Constitution. A person must be a citizen at birth to be a natural born citizen. By natural law, an Article ll 'natural born' Citizen is a citizen at birth under the cloak of allegiance of its father. This is what De Vattel observed as our natural political right of inheritance.
Allowing the courts to decide who is or who isn't a 'natural born' Citizen allows the plenary authority of government to create the 'ruling class' rather than our founding fathers and the Constitution.
This is why many Tea Party supporters are waiting to see if Mitt Romney stands up to Obama and the Constitution.
ex animo
davidfarrar
Lizzy Hatch
8:16 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Obama was born in Hawaii, get over it.
Although your post speaks volumes as to why Romney will not denounce Trump and although he knows your full of it, he wants your vote and will allow you to whisper your sweet nothings in his ear to get it.
FELIX DIAZ
9:42 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
HUH?
Mama D
11:05 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Zero logic and so completely disrespectful to the State of Hawaii, the hospital where he was born, the newpapers who reported it, the doctor who delivered him, my personal friend who was in the maternity ward with Mrs. Obama, not to mention all of their friends, relatives and colleagues who were THERE, who helped raise the President. To say nothing of his amazing grandparents, his mother and sister. How dare you? It speaks to what lies deep within, which is this basic desire and need to make the President "other" when, in fact, his story is a truly American story with roots on his mother's side that go back generations. You just cannot stand that he is President. Well, he is and most likely will be for four more years.
Peter Desmond
11:20 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Willard Mitt Romney's father WAS BORN in Mexico - but the gop ran him for president WITHOUT checking HIS papers. John McCain WAS BORN in the Panama Canal Zone...IF it was on US Military property then TECHNICALLY he was born in America...but IF it was across the street, then he WAS NOT born here. Did ANYONE in the gop ask to check their papers? No, just for this black man!!! For God's sake they FAILED to even ask Palin if she has read or knows what our CONstitution says! No David...."WE the People" are satisfied that the contemporaneous announcement of his birth is TRUE&FACTUAL....as is his Birth Certificate witnessed and SWORN to by the Republican in Hawaii. As is the Certificate of Live Birth (just like Romney released) also TRUE & VERIFIABLE. So all you and others are talking here is smoke & mirrors, trying to gin up the fear game again. Do you have ANYTHING of substance for America or just this shi(f)t? PS. There is NO tea party, only angry reTHUGliCLOWN$ trying on funny hats!
David Farrar
11:54 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Mama D,
But we have not been able to access Obama's natal hospital records. Obama has failed to give the hospital permission. It would be true, if we could have access to his hospital records; we could clear this up in 15 minutes in a judge's chambers.
As I stated earlier, the newspaper birth announcement were simple reflections of Hawaii's Health Department records.
We don't know who delivered Obama. The doctor listed on his long form certificate
was only the certifying doctor, not necessarily his delivery doctor. In any case, he is dead so he can't tells use on way or another if he actually saw Obama.
I am not sure who your "personal friend" is who was in the maternity ward with Mrs. Obama. And at present, I am not aware of any friends, relatives and colleagues who were THERE at his birth, other than the mother of the Nordyke twins, whose account remains unsubstantiated.
ex animo
davidfarrar
David Farrar
11:59 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Peter Desmond
Barack Obama wasn't the first, nor the only, presidential candidate back in 2008 that was sued in federal court over his "natural born Citizen" qualifications. John McCain was by a "white" lawyer named Leo Donofrio, Esq.
ex animo
davidfarrar
Magrum Yuff
12:03 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
"By natural law, an Article ll 'natural born' Citizen is a citizen at birth under the cloak of allegiance of its father." By "natural law," you say? Did you make that up all by yourself, or did someone else make it up? Natural law, indeed. I see the phrase, "natural born citizen" in Article II. How to define that is, I suppose, subject to interpretation. But natural law? Who determines what that means?
Colleen Harper
12:42 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Wrong, David. The courts have determined that any person born on American soil is an American citizen. Why do conservatives cry and cover themselves with sackcloth and ashes over anchor babies?
David Farrar
1:24 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Colleen Harper
Because it's not within the jurisdiction of the judiciary branch of government, nor any plenary authority of government, to define a Constitutional term already perfectly defined by our Founding Fathers and natural law.
ex animo
davidfarrar
Huina Smith
1:54 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
What if Mitt Romney would not stand up to Obama on the Birther issue (as he is trying to do this awkward dance with trump: "I love your money but don't like the birther company you keep"), what will the Tea Party do? They are still going to support and vote for Romney. Tea Party is not about principle or the Constitution, it's all about Obama who they just don't like, that's all.
Colleen Harper
4:59 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
David,
The 14th Amendment states:
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
It does NOT say "born AND naturalized." It says "born." It makes NO mention that the parents must meet qualifications for the child "born" in the United States. It covers only the condition of the child, that the child be "born" in the United States to qualify as a citizen.
This is why conservatives hate Hispanic "anchor babies," because they are by law citizens of the United States when they are "born" here.
Why do you hate the Constitution?
jrterrier5
8:42 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
At this point, the question is why did the publicity for President Obama's book state that he was "born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia." The pamphlet for the book stated this from 1991 until around 2006. What is up with that?
Let's not forget the US-birth is a constitutional prerequisite for being President so this is not just some minor issue.
Can it be that the President for all those years never saw that? Is this another Elizabeth Warren incident, where he was claiming to be someone he was not. If the Washington Post can devote 5000 words and a front page article to Mitt Romney's teenage years, the media should get to the bottom of this.
EM
10:49 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Now why on earth would there be a publicity pamphlet for a book that won't be published for another four years? More to the point, why has no one but you ever heard of such a thing as a "pamphlet" for a book?
Now you have to choose. Are you a feckless liar for making crap up and spitting it out just to see what it sounds like? Or you simply so foolishly gullible as to believe the crap that someone else made up and spit out?
WHICH IS IT? Are you a liar or are you stupid?
Mama D
11:12 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Below find the direct quote from the assistant at this agency who made the error. It was a pamphlet promotion POSSIBLE new books coming in the future. Mr. Obama eventually left this agency and abandoned this project to write Dreams of my Father for another publisher. He had no knowledge of this error. Sorry jrterrier5, just another non-story.
Miriam Goderich of the publishing firm Action & Drystel has told Taegan Goddard’s Political Wire that the printing was a “fact checking error.”
“This was nothing more than a fact checking error by me — an agency assistant at the time,” Goderich said. “There was never any information given to us by Obama in any of his correspondence or other communications suggesting in any way that he was born in Kenya and not Hawaii.
Jim
11:52 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Don't hold your breath..They are responsible for this empty suit getting elected.. They want to keep him there...
jrterrier5
2:20 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
here, perhaps you'll believe this:
"Obama's former literary agency misidentified his birthplace as Kenya while trying to promote the then-Harvard Law grad as an author in 1991.
According to a promotional booklet produced by the agency, Acton & Dystel, to showcase its roster of writers, Obama was "born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii."
. . .
"Barack Obama, the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review, was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii. The son of an American anthropologist and a Kenyan finance minister, he attended Columbia University and worked as a financial journalist and editor for Business International Corporation. He served as project coordinator in Harlem for the New York Public Interest Research Group, and was Executive Director of the Developing Communities Project in Chicago's South Side. His commitment to social and racial issues will be evident in his first book, Journeys in Black and White."
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/born-kenya-obamas-literary-agent-misidentified-birthplace-1991/story?id=16372566
jrterrier5
2:24 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
sorry that i have to keep on replying to myself but there is no reply button for those who respond to my original post.
according to ABC, the agency that originally ran the "born in Kenya raised in Indonesia" bio facts continues to represent President Obama. I do not know whether the story is true, my point is that this is should be explored by the media and explained by the President.
from the abc story:
"According to a promotional booklet produced by the agency, Acton & Dystel, to showcase its roster of writers, Obama was "born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii."
"Miriam Goderich edited the text of the bio; she is now a partner at the Dystel & Goderich agency, which lists Obama as one of its current clients.
"This was nothing more than a fact checking error by me--an agency assistant at the time," Goderich wrote in an emailed statement to Yahoo News. "There was never any information given to us by Obama in any of his correspondence or other communications suggesting in any way that he was born in Kenya and not Hawaii. I hope you can communicate to your readers that this was a simple mistake and nothing more."
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/born-kenya-obamas-literary-agent-misidentified-birthplace-1991/story?id=16372566
sharon
3:04 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Barack Obama was born in Kenya and attended Harvard University. His son, also named Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii and attended Harvard University. Surely, you can see how an error could be made. Barack Obama, the son, has a birth certificate which has been verified by Hawaiian officials, including a Republican governor. The birth certificate proves the pamphlet's error.
HowthCastle
7:07 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012
A publicity pamphlet is a legal document, but a birth certificate (long form) is not! OK!
John Q Citizen
9:08 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Not so fast Huckabee,
""You know what, that just shows how wrong the Democrats are about that and about everything else they've been promoting the last four years,...since they can't get even the simplest facts right,... make sure they're not in charge and in power the next four years."
It's not logical to claim that someone is wrong about everything just because they got something trivially wrong about a view of yours -- which, by the way, you have led them to believe, on at least 4 occasions, by things you have said on Fox News. Getting something so trivial wrong, based on things you yourself have said, By your logic, the Republicans, who revel in not getting facts straight, should relinquish all political power immediately.
"I'm far less concerned with where Obama came from, than where he is taking the country. That's my concern, not the past, the future,"
Everyone should be concerned about where Obama is taking the country. We should be; we're citizens. But the major voices of the Republican Party have given evidence -- and even admitted on occasion -- that they are colluding together to obfuscate the truth about where Obama is taking this country. Obama has evidently attempted to take the country in a very centrist direction which is a far right version of the Democratic ideals, especially with the continued attempts to compromise with the Republican far right. It is likely that those compromises with the right has kept the country from improving faster.
Steve From NH
9:10 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
So somebody invented a time machine, went back to 1961, infiltrated the State of Hawaii's Health Department and planted a fake birth record from the hospital so it would get in the Honolulu Advertiser? You birther folks are a riot, please keep it coming. Romney won't stand up with Trump on the birther issue because it's completely ridiculous. He's not that stupid. Trump, on the other hand, just likes to hear himself talk. As George Will says, "Bloviating Idiot".
David Farrar
9:39 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
A time machine isn't necessary. The fact are these: Hawaii did, and still does, issue birth certificates to persons born off-island to as much as a year after the birth. All one needs to do is fill out an application. If this was done with Obama, which many Birthers, including this one, thinks if this is true; we should be told by Hawaiian Health Department officials.
Secondly, the contemporaneous newspapers birth announcements were public service notices, taken directly from the Hawaiian Health Department Index files. These two notices were not from a private, third party. Those birth notices were placed in a different section other than the "public service" section.
But I don't expect to see either Obama, nor Romney discussing this issue at any great lengths because Mitt Romney has a similar problem...his father was born in Mexico to expatriated US citizen parents who gave up their US citizen to be allowed by Mexican authorities to colonize in Mexico.
Since the Obama campaign knows full well the story of Mitt's Mexican connection and his questionable 'natural born' Citizen qualification, this was just a "hit & run" piece by Obama, nothing more.
ex animo
davidfarrar
Magrum Yuff
12:07 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
As George Will says, "Bloviating Idiot". Actually, George Will said "bloviating ignoramus." Otherwise, your post is spot on.
HowthCastle
7:11 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012
Listen: Obama is actually a Suliban. You know, one of those time-travelling terrorists from the Star Trek: Enterprise series. They serve as foot soldiers in the Temporal Cold War and take orders from the mysterious Future Guy. Therefore, Obama is not limited by ordinary constraints of space and time. In 2007, more or less, he can cause public service notices to be placed in Honolulu newspapers of 1961!
Steve From NH
10:32 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Maybe the explanation is a lot simpler than the convoluted, conspiratorical one requiring a fantastic confluence of events and circumstances, some of which really would require a time machine - maybe it's the one that the former Republican head of the Hawaii Health Dept. swears is true - he was born in Hawaii.
By the way, I'm pretty sure nobody really knows what "Natural Born Citizen" means in the first place. I bet you think you do, but I'm afraid that's not authoritative. And how about the first Presidents, who were all born English subjects? Just wondering.
Obama was born in the US. Area 51 is just a place in N.M. Flouridation isn't mind control, and US Govt. airplanes aren't spraying brainwashing chemicals from high altitudes. The earth goes around the sun, and Neil Armstrong did walk on the moon. But you people sure are entertaining.
David Farrar
10:46 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Steve,
Your question about the first Presidents, who were all born English subjects, is an interesting one, but one the Founding Fathers fully anticipated when they included the "grandfather" clause into Article ll: "...or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President."
ex animo
davidfarrar
into Article llLL? Just wondering.
Steve From NH
11:08 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
How about someone born in a military hospital in Germany? They would not be eligible, correct? But if I have it right, someone born to a German couple in an airport in Newark would be a US citizen? This could get pretty confusing.
Luckily in Obamas case it's not - he was born in the US, in Hawaii.
David Farrar
12:10 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Mama D,
If you are in a position to offer any independent, corroborative evidence that Barack Obama was born when and where he states; please do so. Do you have any of Barack Obama's natal hospital records? How about Ann Dunham's hospital registration record? Any OBGYN records of appointments? Any copies of Obama's natal hospital invoices sent out to pay for the delivery? How about any hospital invoices of payment received, and who paid them?
Do you have any independent, corroborative evidence, other than running your gums, to prove Barack Obama was born when and where he states? If so; please offer it up now and help us get to the truth of this matter once and for all.
ex animo
davidfarrar
george
11:02 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Seems to me that the parties making the allegations bear the burden of proof. Consequently, where is the proof that Obama was not born in Hawaii ?
Mama D
11:23 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
exactly. There ISN'T any! Lord, these people are nuts. Mr. Farrar, your theory of making a request a year later does not explain the newspapers being printed the week of his birth. Duh. Not only is it ridiculous and insulting, but as a citizen of Hawaii, you people do not understand how hurtful these attacks are to the people of Hawaii. People who knew him. People who were there when he was born including the current Governor of the state! And again, yes, verified by the former Republican Governor of the state. Yes, I have personal friends who not only knew him but one who gave birth in the same maternity ward as Mrs. Obama. In those days, a couple like Mr. & Mrs. Obama, one African and one white woman from Kansas, was NOT common in Hawaii. They stood out and are therefore remembered by all who knew them or even met them. My friend's son, then grew up playing basketball with Barack Obama, as did dozens of other young men at that time. Just stop with this nonsense. Give it up because you are wrong wrong wrong. Just plain wrong.
David Farrar
11:41 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
"The burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States * * * is upon those making the claim.” Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640, 653 (1948).
And if each of the General Government’s powers must be proven (not simply presumed) to exist, then every requirement that the Constitution sets for any individual’s exercise of those powers must also be proven (not simply presumed) to be fully satisfied before that individual may exercise any of those powers."
What this means is, it is Barack Obama's responsibility to "prove" his eligibility, not the electorate's.
ex animo
davidfarrar
jrterrier5
2:28 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
the bio from the promotional materials by a company that still represents the president (if we can believe ABC). they now claim that it was a typographical error.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/born-kenya-obamas-literary-agent-misidentified-birthplace-1991/story?id=16372566
Steve From NH
8:47 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
He did prove he was born in Hawaii, he has the document to prove it. It's an official document. It's what the state gives you. If what you are saying is that an official state document isn't enough proof, then nobody anywhere can prove they were born where they said they were. Ergo, nobody is eligible to become President. I don't care how much Latin you come up with, your "argument" is ridiculous.
swinedance
9:28 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Thank you.
Floyd Massey
11:24 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
The Republican leadership doesn't require proof or truth. They just spit out lies and expect everyone to believe.
george
11:43 am on Thursday, May 31, 2012
So where is your evidence Mr. Farrar ?
Mama D
12:34 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
@David Farrar, I know you will argue this til the cows come home. There is no convincing someone like you even with as Jon Stewart said, and I paraphrase, we offered a home video of the birth with Don Ho playing ukulele in the background! (come on, smile) Of course I personally don't have hospital records but that is what the State requires for the registration of birth. What you are talking about is such a wide net of conspiracy, it's just not plausible. Sorry. Yes, the attending physician is deceased, but his daughter has been interviewed and recalls him telling the story specifically because of what I stated before. Not only were they an unusual couple who stood out, but the name Barack Obama also was completely unique and the doctor came home from the birth and told his family the name. Listen, again, you are insulting people by calling my friend a liar. She was in the same maternity ward. Her son grew up with him. There are so many witnesses, it's just silly. I'm sure you could go on and on as you are doing with the Mitt birth problems and the McCain birth problems, but basically our side doesn't care to do that. Of course you can forever say, what if this, what about that, where's the this or that? It's crazy. You can't fake your birth! Not at this level. Again, it's just not plausible and again, the paper was printed that week. So you're saying his parents somehow planted the story in the paper back then? LUDICROUS.
David Farrar
1:03 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
I am truly sorry you don't have any substantive evidence to present other than hearsay.
Let's be clear: I am only asking for witnesses in Obama's birth, not his older years. Our task now is to try and follow the "evidence" the Hawaiian registrar used to "verify" their records. Until this is made public, it's still not a "proven" issue.
I do remember an article in the papers of the wife of Dr. Sinclair's, stating that she never once hear her husband mention anything at all about the fact that he 'delivered' Barack Obama (a black child). I am not aware of any other testimony regarding the daughter of Dr. Sinclair's.
Perhaps if you could obtain any of the now deceased doctor's records to see if any reference of Ann Dunnham ,a.k.a Ann Obama can be found in them might help. The fact that none of these records have surfaced this far tells me that, sadly, none exist.
ex animo
davidfarrar
KatieC
9:40 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
MamaD I am afraid for your health. Calm down. Listen the people who believe that Pres. Obama was born in Kenya are never going to believe anything other than that. It is useless to argue with them and get yourself all upset. You yourself said Jon Stewart said the "Birthers" would not believe Barack Obama was born in Hawaii if they had a BIRTHER CAM IN THE DELIVERY ROOM AND DON HO HUNG A LEI AROUND THE BABY'S HEAD. They are ridiculous, bigoted, hate driven, ignorant fools.
David Farrar
12:48 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Magrum Yuff
Who determines what that means?
That's a good question. The answer to which can be found in the Declaration of Independence....these are "self-evident" truths, recognized by all. As de Vattel observed, the natural right of inheritance is recognized the world over.
When women marry in this country, they usually change their sir names to the husband, following de Vattel's natural law of inheritance.
Let's go back before 1776. Suppose you have two North American Indiana tribes, let's say Iroquois and Sioux. Now let's say an Iroquois man and his wife who is of the Cherokee tribe, and pregnant, are traveling across Sioux territory and they stop and camp on Sioux territory for the night and the Cherokee mother gives birth to a child on Sioux territory. Does that make the child Sioux, Cherokee, or Iroquois?
The entire point of "natural born" is the parents. You cannot be "natural born" without parents (father particularly). "Natural born" is not a legal term to be defined by statutes or judges opinions, least the plenary authority of government will create the 'ruling class' instead of natural law, as our Founding Fathers and the Constitution demand
ex animo
davidfarrar
Glamourgal
12:50 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Can't we just stick to the political issues and vote for the person who has the goals for the United States that you agree with? It's not about color, where a person was born, what religion they belong to, or even political affiliation. It's about what the candidate plans to do if he/she becomes President of the United States. The President of the United States deserves the respect of EVERY American, whether you like the person or not. The majority has spoken - that's why we call it a DEMOCRACY!
David Farrar
3:51 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
The real political issue at hand is who is going to define the ruling class; the government or the Constitution?
Again, Article ll is all about who sets the qualifications of the President and Vice-President ( the ruling class): the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and natural law, as our Founding fathers ordained on one side; or the plenary hand of government on the other: be it the courts, Congress, or any other plenary appointed authority?
One thing is known for certain: if we allow Congress to create the ruling class, they will do so to their own advantage and we will soon lose yet another one of our cherished, self-evident, unalienable truths: that all men are created equal.
ex animo
davidfarrar
KatieC
9:43 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
You are absolutely right Glamourgal. Every Political Party has its nuts and the Birthers are the Republican Party nuts. Leave them to the Squirrels.
SALS
12:58 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
I cannot believe how many stupid people there are: Obama's birth certificate? rationalizing our war in Iraq , when it didn't have a damn thing to do with anything but oil, rationalizing what the repubs are trying to do today, moving our country to an oligarchy (a form of government in which all power is vested in a few persons or in a dominant class or clique; government by the few. government by the few. 2. : a government in which a small group exercises control especially for corrupt and selfish purposes; ) and that small few are the 1%. It looks like that is where we are or where we are headed. The people are just too damn dumb/stupid to realize it and stop it.
Glamourgal
1:07 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
I agree completely!
KatieC
9:44 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
You are so right SALS. You hit the nail on the head.
Juanita Esposito
1:43 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Why don't all you birthers just go Jump in a lake and drown yourselves, because you
aren't doing anything for the good of our country. The world is laughing at your stupidy.
David Farrar
1:48 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
I see you have run out of any substantive responses and are so frightened by the truth, you are quite literally speechless.
ex animo
davidfarrar
MarkoPaul
1:55 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Huckabee seems to want to have it both ways on the "birther" issue. See:
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/03/mike-huckabee-falsely-suggests-obama-grew-up-in-kenya/
He's context senstive - his views depend on whom he is addressing. Kind of like a flip-flop.
jrterrier5
2:45 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
To MamaD,
My point is that the media -- NYTimes, WaPo, etc should look into this. The explanation that it was a typographical error seems like bull to me. A typo is when your write 1979 insteado 1997; or real when you meant reel. He "was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia" is not a typo. It's either correct or a huge mistake. Moreover, according to the ABC story the company continues today to represent the President. Supposedly the "typo" remained in their promotional materials from 1991 until 2006. It just sounds a little crazy to me. i'm not an author but from time to time i've lectured on different topics and have been asked to submit a bio blurb or to review something someone else has written about me.
this "typo" just seems bizarre to me. you really have to be a partisan to accept at face value that it was nothing more than a typo that persisted for more than 15 years. the media pursues non-stories about minor lights every day. they dug up highschool classmates of romney for a front-page story. this just seems on a par. perhaps it's nothing more than a dingy editor but has this editor made similar mistakes about other authors? is she known to be this careless in writing blurbs? did President Obama never see this? What prompted the correction in 2006? inquiring minds want to know.
Mama D
4:57 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
again, did you read what she said and what this pamphlet actually was? She never said "typo", she said a "fact checking error." In other words, she never checked her facts. This was to promote a POSSIBLE book from a new author....she probably got some sketchy info....oh look he's got a Kenyan father and a mother from Kansas...great hook...born in Kenya. She never fact checked it and says she had no communication with Mr. Obama. AND this was this pamphlet that never went anywhere BECAUSE Mr. Obama did not in fact write that book, but LEFT this agency and went to another agency to eventually write Dreams of my Father. Are you listening at all? No one said typo. No one said this accompanied the President at anytime, anywhere. He left this agency. They basically never represented him as a published author. They asked him to write a book at one point that he never wrote and then he left them. He basically had no association with them and I am certain never saw this so called pamphlet.
jrterrier5
3:11 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Sharon, was the father raised in Indonesia? Did President Obama never see the blurb? Why was it corrected in 2006?
The explanation given by the person who supposedly made the error is that it was typographical error. She did not provide the "explanation" that you have raised. I can see how any number of errors can be made. All I am arguing is that the media should interview the woman. Should do an investigative story about it.
I just cannot see how such an error remained from 1991 until 2006.
David Farrar
3:20 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Huina Smith,
What will the Tea Party do?
They will, of course, support Romney. But not all of them. Many social conservatives simply will not vote for Romney on religious grounds; which is probably why Mike Huckabee thinks he can be "of service" -- for a price.
But Mitt Romney has his own problems with Article ll "natural born" Citizen qualifications. His father was born in Mexico. The problem center's around the lack of US citizenship Gaskell Romney (Mitt's grandfather) had at the time of George's (Mitt's father) birth in Mexico. According to Romney's campaign, we are asked to believe that Gaskell did not give up his US Citizenship after living 25 years in Mexico, while Mexican naturalization records indicate that at least Mitt's grandmother was a Mexican national at the time of George's birth. The Romney/Mexican story is fascinatingly complex. But one that will have to be confronted by Mitt at some point.
ex animo
davidfarrar
David Farrar
4:06 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Steve From NH
"By the way, I'm pretty sure nobody really knows what "Natural Born Citizen" means in the first place. I bet you think you do, but I'm afraid that's not authoritative."
You are quite correct. I am only one person with a story to tell. As to how self-evident my story is; only the Reader can judge.
But a plenary authority cannot create natural born citizens; it can only create naturalized citizens at birth. It does this via jus soli or via naturalization proceedings ,
ex animo
davidfarrar
Mauigrrl
4:18 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Oh, boy. The birther's are delusional and trying to convince them of the truth is impossible so we should just not try. Obama no ka oi!!!!
David Farrar
7:16 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
How convenient..you just won't try.
ex animo
davidfarrar
HowthCastle
9:00 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012
I also won't try levitation, teleportation, or telepathy.
Mauigrrl
4:21 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
I work for the State of Hawai'i, Dept. of Health, btw. Insulting!
Mama D
5:01 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
right? Thank you Mauigirl! Represent!
David Farrar
7:15 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Another gum flapper. Where's the beef?
We need to see just what documentary evidence the Hawaiian registrar used to "verify" Barack Obama as an Article ll 'natural born Citizen. Can you do that for me; Ms. I-work-for-the-State-of-Hawai'i- Dept.-of-Health?
ex animo
davidfarrar
Mauigrrl
7:59 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
The State of Hawai'i doesn't have to show you anything. They already have. Besides, delusional (and I'm guessing, racist) people like you, no matter what proof is shown, will always believe Hawai'i (the State, the hospital, Punahou, etc.) was a player in the best cover-up ever, as truly delusional as that sounds. It still won't change the fact that Barack Hussein Obama was born on Oahu. Auwe!
Steve From NH
9:08 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Howzit!
Hawaii's official documents are apparently meaningless. According to David Farrar, if all you have is a birth certificate (silly official papers!), you can't prove anything. Fortunately, he isn't the one making the decisions. He thinks he is, but he's not.
New Hampshire is full of these wingnuts, but they are just loud and obnoxious (at least the ones without guns). They are comical and entertaining, and will help get President Obama re-elected. We should encourage them. Even if it means a spike in the price of tinfoil due to the demand for hats.
Used to live in Hawaii Kai in the 60's and 70's, miss it a lot sometimes. Actually I lived pretty close to where Obama was born. I don't remember any 'here lives the future president of the United States' signs out front though, so maybe it is all a fake. ;)
Mauigrrl
4:23 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Anyway, this subject is mute, because he's going to win again. Like it or not, bigots!
David Farrar
7:16 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Right...you keep thinking that.
ex animo
davidfarrar
Mauigrrl
5:19 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Mama D, kama'aina know, eh?? Represent!!
Mama D
6:44 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
yes we do!
David Farrar
7:11 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
sharon
Yes, I can certainly see how the "error" was made. What I can't see is why it took 17 years to correct it?
ex animo
davidfarrar
David Farrar
8:57 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Steve From NH,
"He did prove he was born in Hawaii, he has the document to prove it."
Steve,
From the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General
A study entitled: BIRTH CERTIFICATE FRAUD OEI-07-99-00570
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FINDING: "A certified copy of a birth certificate is proof only that a birth occurred and was recorded." OEI- 07-99-00570
What this means is, as a matter of proof in a judicial setting, the only thing that is "Proven" is that a birth occurred and that it was recorded. All the other information on that state certified document must be proven the old fashion way by a preponderance of the evidence.
ex animo
davidfarrar
jrterrier5
10:40 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
MamaD, ok, sorry, she says fact-checking error. but your post also contains errors. first, according to the ABC article the President Obama is a current client of Dystel & Goderich, so you are incorrect that they never represented him. "Miriam Goderich edited the text of the bio; she is now a partner at the Dystel & Goderich agency, which lists Obama as one of its current clients." second, there is no record that Obama never saw the bio blurb. remember, this was first listed in 1991, long before he became the busy politician he is now. the "born in kenya" statement remained on the Dystel & Goderich website until 2007.
i just find it hard to believe that he didn't see it. the fact that one person is willing to take the fall and deny shouldn't be the end of the story. it never is on any other issue.
i'm not a birther. i just think a democracy needs an independent, probing press that is not in the tank for one person or another, particularly when that person is the most powerful man in the USA if not the world. i just think this is a question that should be put to the president -- were you not aware that this was out there?
jrterrier5
10:47 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
regarding whether one person's denial (i'm talking about the "born in kenya" blurb not the birth certificate) should ever be enough, we have a recent example. for weeks elizabeth warren has been stating that she was not responsible for telling Harvard that she was cherokee. today, she comes out and says, never mind, it was me who told harvard that i was cherokee.
in some ways, it's not a big deal. just a collateral matter. in other ways, it goes to the heart of the problems with politicians and the bull they spread everywhere. people need to be more honest.
SALS
11:46 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
Interesting we talk about how honesty is important and mention the democrats that have not been so....where was this discussion about sarah palin? being from wasilla , we knew she wasn't pregnant with trig, but that was just one lie after another and we got totally shut down by the repubs and tea party and chastised the journalists who tried to get to the truth behind all her lies. McCain knew she didn't have trig...she is a grifter and has been known throghout the valley as a user and grifter, vindictive to anyone who wants the truth. How come you people are not all over her about her lies? Don't tell me it doesn't matter because she is not running for anything.
jrterrier5
3:48 am on Friday, June 1, 2012
two wrongs don't make a right. but what are you talking about that she wasn't pregnant with trig. who the heck is trig's mother then?
george
1:18 am on Friday, June 1, 2012
David Farrar: You continue making circular arguments. The President did in fact provide proof of his birth in Hawaii. If you or anyone else are still not convinced, that is your problem, not his. Even most republicans have stated that they believe that he was born in Hawaii. Obama certainly and absolutely has no further burden of proof as he has already offered it. If fringe groups like birthers are still not convinced, they need to mount an inquiry and show evidence. But of course, there is none, just as Trump found out when he stated that he had investigators in Hawaii working on this, yet he has never presented a concrete case, merely innuendo.
David Farrar
8:54 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012
No...he did not provide "proof". He provided verification. Providing proof implies the documentary evidence the Hawaiian registrar used to "verify" the facts in Barack Obama's case are revealed and examined.
ex animo
davidfarrar
ex animo
davidfarrar
george
5:02 am on Friday, June 1, 2012
Another point if I may. Don't you think that the republicans, with their unlimited sources of funding, would be trying to make an evidence-based case to show that the President was not born in the US ?. Would not the Kochs be eager to fund a proper inquiry if they believed that there was something to the birthers' allegations ?. After all, a convincing and well documented case would at the very least ensure that the President is not re-elected and the democratic party suffers defeats across the political spectrum. Would not the republicans pursue this if they knew that there was something to it ?
Steve From NH
6:57 am on Friday, June 1, 2012
David Farrar, if that is really who you are, you are in grave danger of declaring yourself a non-person by your own arguments. There was a birth, and it was recorded is all that reasonable people need, and luckily we are still mostly reasonable people.
Birthers are not reasonable people, by definition.
I think I know you - you are the kids in elementary school who can't stand someone who is different than they are. Different looking, talks funny, had polio, red hair, lisps, is a different color, one or more take your pick, pick your insult, it was you people making the lives of others miserable because you didn't like the way they looked. A lot of those bullies grew up, you didn't. You're still at it, bigger words, fancier arguments, but the same underlying reasons, and you never grew up. You're down deep afraid that you're not good enough, never will be, and because you couldn't break those people maybe they really are stronger and better than you'll ever be.
I bullied a few people when I was a kid, I'm ashamed, you people have none.
You bolt up and yell about tyranny and free speech while trampling on the rights of everyone that disagrees with your idiotic notions. You hide behind flags, pieces of paper and ridiculous costumes because you can't let anyone see the rot underneath.
I feel sorry for you folks, there's a wonderful world outside your living room, full of people that are different, beautiful, kind and worth a thousand fold of people like the birthers.
David Farrar
7:32 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012
Colleen Harper
The 14th Amendment does not create Article ll 'natural born' Citizens. It creates exactly what is says it creates... US Citizens at birth.
The problem with the 14th Amendment, and where the courts have traditionally made their mistakes, is in assuming somehow the state can bestow American citizenship allegiance on a person born without the cloak of allegiance of their father.
The court now incorrectly assumes it can create the ruling class instead of the Constitution and our Founding Fathers. Again, plenary authority cannot create Article ll 'natural born' US citizens; it can only create naturalized US citizens. It does this via jus soli or via naturalized.
The amendment says "born or "naturalized". There is nothing stipulating that naturalization only takes place after birth. But since the courts cannot make natural law, the court have no jurisdiction to alter the natural law of inheritance as the basis of the self-evident, unalienable truth Thomas Jefferson proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence: that all mean are created equal.
ex animo
davidfarrar
Ruth Dwyer
5:10 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
After reading the "Arguments" in behalf of the Prez, authenticity ... a fact remains: B.O. was WAS BORN IN KENYA!
Recently, I saw a YouTube Film of B.O. addressing a Class of Harvard Students . He proudly said: "I AM NOT AMERICAN. I WAS BORN IN KENYA." It was a "Jaw dropper!"
I forwarded it to friends. Perhaps they also forwarded it... but since then that film's no longer available! WE can argue till the Cows come Home but the fact remains, He was born in Kenya, as he admitted.
The man is a fraud! If that hurts your Democrat sensibilities, too bad! And if he's re-elected, America will no longer be "The Land of the Free." So get ready for the Bread Lines for we will see a Depression to make the last one seem like Child's play. The man has an AGENDA!
Perhaps it's time to Google George Soros, "the Puppet Master" who's pulling B.O.'s Strings. Our Constitution is hanging by a Thread because of his murky agenda. So.... while you argue about where this Impostor was born, why not speculate what Bread Lines will be like.
So ... fasten your Seat Belts, Folks b/cuz it's gonna be a VERY bumpy ride in the not so distant future if this person is voted, again, into the most important Job on the Planet!
SWEET DREAMS!
KatieC
9:51 am on Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Ruth take two aspirin and go to bed and if you don't feel better in the morning call your Doctor and get a referral for a shrink because you are NUTS.